(This pic is edited.)
Surprise!
Another Democrat posts pictures of his wee bait and tackle online and gets busted with his pants quite literally down, and right before an election, too!
Does he resign in humiliation? Does he even apologize?
Hell, no, chumps! He's a
democrat, so there's no way he has to accept responsibility for his stupid, pervy actions!
In fact, C. Stephen Eckel is defending his peen-pics as, and I shit you not on this,
art.
Read this and try not to swallow your teeth with laughter (all emphasis mine):
C. Stephen Eckel removed two of the photos Friday after 13WHAM's Sean Carroll questioned Eckel, a Democrat, about the photographs. Those two images very clearly showed his private parts and were accessible on the website without any filters, disclaimers, or warnings.
(Because it's ART. That's why Eckel took the pics of his bits down.)
There is no doubting that the photos are presented as art and Eckel confirmed that they are of him and were part of a class project he worked on eleven years ago while pursuing a Master's of Fine Arts degree.
(Ooh, this was his FA thesis, eh? I'll bet a lot of the OWS dirtbags with equally 'useful' degrees are working on similar 'projects' every night in those filthy tents, especially with unwilling participants.)
"I invite people to look at it and judge for themselves,” Eckel said in an interview with 13WHAM News hours after this was brought to his attention.
(I judged. You're a perv.)
“This is art. This is my art. This is my work and as a professor of photography that's what they want to see if they're evaluating me for a position."
(Your wrinkly dink is not art. It's your wrinkly dink. Also, I would question whether that's what 'they' want to see when evaluating you for a 'position', and also, why can't you find gainful employment with your FINE ARTS degree?Also, if all it takes to get a master's degree in fine arts is a webcam crotch-shot, I would laughingly suggest that you were robbed by your university. Have fun with those student loans! Maybe you can join the previously mentioned OWS'ers!)
The Rochester Democrat and Chronicle describes the photos as sepia-toned, taken with a wide lens at an elevated angle, and were full frontal nude shots of Eckel but not sexual in nature.
(Ah. Select sepia tone on your webcam program and tilt the cam back and BOOM, you've got ART. Gotcha.)
Now I may not know art, but this kind of schlock ranks up there with Piss Christ as far as I'm concerned. Scrotums (Scroti?) aren't exactly riveting medium. It's shock-crap for untalented and uncreative hacks.
Now all I have to do is wait for our favorite high-brow,
Ducky, to show up and tell me how a middle-aged man's cock is "ethereal."
